SURGICAL HAND ASEPSIS PLUS
SSIsOne study randomised 3317 participants to basic hand hygiene (soap and water) versus an alcohol rub plus additional hydrogen peroxide. These factors reduced the quality of the evidence. In general studies were small, and some did not present data or analyses that could be easily interpreted or related to clinical outcomes. Four trials reported the primary outcome, rates of SSIs, while 10 trials reported number of CFUs but not SSI rates.
SURGICAL HAND ASEPSIS TRIAL
Three authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and trial quality and extracted data.įourteen trials were included in the updated review. Randomised controlled trials comparing surgical hand antisepsis of varying duration, methods and antiseptic solutions.
There were no restrictions with respect to language, date of publication or study setting. In June 2015 for this update, we searched: The Cochrane Wounds Group Specialized Register The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library) Ovid MEDLINE Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations) and EBSCO CINAHL. The secondary objective is to determine the effects of surgical hand antisepsis on the numbers of colony-forming units (CFUs) of bacteria on the hands of the surgical team. To assess the effects of surgical hand antisepsis on preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients treated in any setting. Antisepsis may reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients. Medical professionals routinely carry out surgical hand antisepsis before undertaking invasive procedures to destroy transient micro-organisms and inhibit the growth of resident micro-organisms.
0 kommentar(er)
